Exemptions from Real Property Taxation in New York State: 2023 County, City, and Town Assessment Rolls
Introduction
All real property in New York is subject to taxation unless specific legal provisions grant it exempt status, whereas personal property is not subject to taxation. Real property tax exemptions are granted on the basis of many different criteria, including the use to which the property is put, the owner's ability to pay taxes, the desire of the state and local governments to encourage certain economic or social activities, and other such considerations.1 Certain exemptions provide full relief from taxation (wholly exempt property) and others reduce the taxes which would otherwise be payable by varying degrees (partially exempt property). Some exemptions apply to taxes levied for county, city/town, and school purposes, whereas others pertain only to some of these purposes. Yet another difference involves the extent of local government autonomy: while some exemptions are mandated by state law, others are subject to local option and/or local determination of eligibility criteria.
This report presents exemption data for 2023 assessment rolls prepared by local assessors throughout New York.2 It covers town, city, and county (Tompkins and Nassau Counties) assessment rolls only; village rolls are not included.
Ultimately, the accuracy of the figures presented depends on the accuracy of the data submitted on the rolls. Although the overwhelming majority of reported exemptions could be related to specific legal provisions through the standardized reporting system provided by NYS Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Real Property Tax Services (ORPTS), a very small percentage could not be classified because incorrect codes were used, and are thus omitted from certain tables in this report. Similarly, any errors made by assessors in determining the value of a parcel, or the extent to which this value is exempt from taxation, will appear in the data contained herein. Also, experience has shown that some assessors may not keep the values placed on wholly exempt property fully up to date, as valuation of such property has, for the most part, no effect on local tax revenue. Incorrect assessed values may overstate or understate the effect of exemptions on local tax bases.
The remainder of the report presents a summary of the 2023 statewide statistics on exempt property in graphic and tabular format, followed by Appendix A, which contains a list of abbreviations and definitions for terms used in the detailed tables that comprise Appendix B.
Table 1. Real Property tax exemptions by property group, 2023 assessment rolls
Table 1. Real Property tax exemptions, 2023 rolls
Group
Number of exemptions
Equalized Exempt Value ($000)
A.
Residential Property other than Multiple Dwellings Non-Residential Property Owned by Certain Individuals
2,967,211
222,724,678
B.
Property of New York State Government and Agencies
21,491
139,182,427
C.
Property of Municipal Governments and Agencies, School Districts, BOCES, and Special Districts
115,061
269,105,386
D.
Property of U.S. and Foreign Governments and Agencies, International or Interstate Agencies, and Indian Tribes
4,857
71,037,688
E.
Property of Private Community Service Organizations, Social Organizations, and Professional Societies
71,789
162,362,601
F.
Industrial, Commercial, and Public Service Property
19,579
92,169,785
G.
Urban Renewal Property, Public Housing, and Private Subsidized Housing (Multiple Dwellings)
92,774
110,163,172
H.
Agricultural and Forest Properties
115,374
13,888,902
Total, Valid Exemption Codes
3,408,136
1,080,634,638
Invalid Codes
3,777
1,817,998
TOTAL
3,411,913
1,082,452,636
Table 2. Exemptions for county purposes: Geographic areas with highest and lowest incidence of exempt value, 2023 assessment rolls
A. Ten with highest incidence
Rank
Counties
Cities
Towns
Name
Pct. exempt
Name
Pct. exempt
Name
Pct. exempt
1.
Oswego
37.69%
Salamanca (Cat.)
68.60%
Scriba (Osw.)
84.14%
2.
Tompkins
37.61%
Rensselaer (Ren.)
66.74%
Alfred (All.)
78.74%
3.
Seneca
36.66%
Albany (Alb.)
63.21%
Blenheim (Scho.)
74.65%
4.
St Lawrence
35.74%
Ithaca (Tom.)
58.32%
Romulus (Sen.)
74.07%
5.
Oneida
34.11%
Geneva (Ont.)
56.06%
Ashford (Cat.)
72.82%
6.
Albany
33.27%
Syracuse (Ono.)
51.88%
Marcy (One.)
72.07%
7.
Niagara
31.56%
Ogdensburg (St. L)
49.41%
Massena (St. L)
68.56%
8.
Schoharie
31.06%
Peekskill (Wes.)
49.23%
Verona (One.)
68.09%
9
Wyoming
30.99%
Oneonta (Ots.)
46.82%
Lewiston (Nia.)
66.40%
10.
Allegany
30.72%
Rome (One.)
46.11%
Dover (Dut.)
65.33%
B. Ten with lowest incidence
Rank
Counties
Cities
Towns
Name
Pct. exempt
Name
Pct. exempt
Name
Pct. exempt
1.
Hamilton
8.27%
Mechanicville (Sar.)
8.23%
Benson (Ham.)
1.04%
2.
Putnam
9.62%
Tonawanda (Eri.)
11.75%
Inlet (Ham.)
1.88%
3.
Warren
10.20%
Sherrill (One.)
12.18%
Arietta (Ham.)
1.90%
4.
Saratoga
12.39%
Lockport (Nia.)
12.99%
Stratford (Ful.)
2.65%
5.
Washington
12.93%
Rye (Wes.)
13.19%
Dresden (Was.)
2.86%
6.
Ulster
13.86%
Beacon (Dut.)
14.68%
Hope (Ham.)
3.01%
7.
Columbia
14.15%
North Tonawanda (Nia.)
15.36%
Bolton (War.)
3.11%
8.
Greene
15.20%
Saratoga Springs (Sar.)
17.61%
Ellicottville (Cat.)
3.13%
9.
Fulton
15.92%
Long Beach (Nas.)
18.90%
Bleecker (Ful.)
3.22%
10.
Rockland
16.16%
Port Jervis (Ora.)
20.10%
Pittsfield (Ots.)
3.32%
Table 3. Exemptions for county purposes: Counties ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 assessment rolls*
Table 3. Exemptions for county purposes: Counties ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 rolls*
Rank
County
No. of exemptions
Exempt value ($000)
Pct. of value exempt
1.
Oswego
11,287
4,913,933
37.69%
2.
Tompkins
7,003
6,068,465
37.61%
3.
Seneca
4,910
1,926,236
36.66%
4.
St Lawrence
12,611
4,190,478
35.74%
5.
Oneida
21,532
8,696,843
34.11%
6.
Albany
19,088
17,531,400
33.27%
7.
Niagara
18,797
8,346,089
31.56%
8.
Schoharie
5,111
1,495,575
31.06%
9.
Wyoming
7,118
1,438,375
30.99%
10.
Allegany
7,208
1,283,717
30.72%
11.
Jefferson
11,601
3,846,564
26.98%
12.
Cattaraugus
10,559
2,278,244
26.70%
13.
Broome
13,824
4,515,229
26.57%
14.
Yates
4,637
1,302,495
26.49%
15.
Tioga
5,028
1,325,749
26.33%
16.
Rensselaer
12,281
5,384,663
26.19%
17.
Nassau
475,364
102,200,477
25.70%
18.
Montgomery
6,061
1,193,290
25.36%
19.
Chautauqua
16,120
3,298,193
24.15%
20.
Livingston
7,775
1,557,619
24.10%
21.
Lewis
5,143
907,595
23.97%
22.
Onondaga
35,917
12,504,194
23.74%
23.
Genesee
8,231
1,252,299
23.59%
24.
Steuben
14,844
2,306,922
23.31%
25.
Sullivan
8,690
4,016,062
23.24%
26.
Franklin
5,134
1,519,406
22.60%
27.
Cayuga
10,015
1,929,374
22.37%
28.
Schenectady
9,712
3,869,247
21.89%
29.
Cortland
5,072
947,727
21.66%
30.
Westchester
32,531
63,118,613
21.51%
31.
Clinton
9,052
1,864,089
21.10%
32.
Orleans
5,557
669,360
20.75%
33.
Madison
8,515
1,540,951
20.71%
34.
Otsego
6,808
1,548,633
20.67%
35.
Chemung
7,472
1,429,508
20.39%
36.
Ontario
10,608
3,430,787
20.27%
37.
Chenango
6,105
836,028
20.21%
38.
Suffolk
118,192
117,761,648
19.88%
39.
Dutchess
18,586
11,132,042
19.74%
40.
Herkimer
6,675
1,543,764
19.41%
41.
Wayne
9,714
1,753,999
18.83%
42.
Monroe
52,907
14,937,487
18.75%
43.
Schuyler
3,266
514,570
18.69%
44.
Erie
71,619
22,186,865
18.54%
45.
Orange
24,006
11,763,810
18.10%
46.
Essex
5,293
1,884,439
17.02%
47.
Delaware
5,282
1,685,936
16.70%
48.
Rockland
16,076
10,731,188
16.16%
49.
Fulton
4,967
956,707
15.92%
50.
Greene
5,463
1,804,870
15.20%
51.
Columbia
7,437
2,151,452
14.15%
52.
Ulster
14,593
5,001,329
13.86%
53.
Washington
8,021
989,125
12.93%
54.
Saratoga
16,167
5,204,314
12.39%
55.
Warren
6,673
1,705,284
10.20%
56.
Putnam
6,474
2,017,579
9.62%
57.
Hamilton
866
328,217
8.27%
*Excludes New York City boroughs; New York City data included in Table 4
Table 4. Exemptions for county purposes: Cities ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 assessment rolls
Table 4. Exemptions for county purposes: Cities ranked by percent of full value exempt, 2023 rolls
Rank
City
No. of exemptions
Exempt value ($000)
Pct. of value exempt
1.
Salamanca
1,433
259,172
68.60%
2.
Rensselaer
469
1,240,916
66.74%
3.
Albany
5,758
11,999,475
63.21%
4.
Ithaca
862
3,575,632
58.32%
5.
Geneva
751
796,024
56.06%
6.
Syracuse
6,878
6,968,163
51.88%
7.
Ogdensburg
812
349,820
49.41%
8.
Peekskill
753
2,610,070
49.23%
9.
Oneonta
506
540,043
46.82%
10.
Rome
2,859
1,574,530
46.11%
11.
Watervliet
356
482,328
46.06%
12.
Troy
1,981
2,192,534
45.88%
13.
Niagara Falls
3,694
1,995,339
45.58%
14.
Little Falls
328
188,505
45.02%
15.
Jamestown
2,221
604,740
39.36%
16.
Elmira
1,562
529,731
38.45%
17.
Schenectady
3,263
1,865,903
37.38%
18.
Utica
3,671
1,506,023
36.97%
19.
Oswego
1,049
596,989
36.74%
20.
Cortland
784
416,012
36.11%
21.
Yonkers
5,268
14,475,469
35.76%
22.
Binghamton
2,388
1,029,513
35.11%
23.
Norwich
333
153,198
34.70%
24.
Olean
1,117
325,896
34.45%
25.
Canandaigua
522
502,150
33.79%
26.
Poughkeepsie
1,050
1,242,247
33.00%
27.
Watertown
1,548
639,899
32.07%
28.
Plattsburgh
1,106
573,106
32.06%
29.
White Plains
1,226
5,425,497
31.61%
30.
Johnstown
566
287,253
31.35%
31.
Auburn
1,776
565,628
30.22%
32.
Amsterdam
1,201
331,307
30.01%
33.
Hornell
730
137,937
29.60%
34.
Oneida
1,127
265,660
29.44%
35.
Dunkirk
1,059
219,299
29.21%
36.
Buffalo
18,783
6,975,435
28.94%
37.
Rochester
10,781
3,738,403
28.84%
38.
New Rochelle
1,856
5,325,165
28.22%
39.
Hudson
430
349,829
26.84%
40.
Mt Vernon
1,450
2,985,818
25.90%
41.
Newburgh
834
674,261
25.73%
42.
Kingston
1,433
936,381
25.47%
43.
New York City
576,042
469,492,318
25.41%
44.
Gloversville
933
168,764
25.02%
45.
Glen Cove
7,735
1,687,779
24.36%
46.
Glens Falls
964
425,919
23.55%
47.
Batavia
1,033
236,667
23.47%
48.
Fulton
811
150,806
23.43%
49.
Cohoes
813
347,868
22.97%
50.
Corning
798
239,829
22.95%
51.
Middletown
1,056
646,515
21.12%
52.
Lackawanna
1,324
244,528
20.27%
53.
Port Jervis
517
163,537
20.10%
54.
Long Beach
9,798
1,715,296
18.90%
55.
Saratoga Springs
1,313
1,384,289
17.61%
56.
North Tonawanda
2,939
441,151
15.36%
57.
Beacon
645
337,341
14.68%
58.
Rye
426
1,743,863
13.19%
59.
Lockport
1,228
187,688
12.99%
60.
Sherrill
57
39,658
12.18%
61.
Tonawanda
1,415
160,898
11.75%
62.
Mechanicville
217
29,111
8.23%
Table 5. Exemptions for county purposes: Towns with over 50 percent full value exempt, 2023 assessment rolls
Table 5. Exemptions for county purposes: Towns with over 50 percent full value exempt, 2023 rolls
Rank
Town
No. of exemptions
Exempt value ($000)
Pct. of value exempt
1.
Scriba (Osw.)
667
2,854,455
84.14%
2.
Alfred (All.)
313
513,129
78.74%
3.
Blenheim (Scho.)
139
177,857
74.65%
4.
Romulus (Sen.)
407
884,251
74.07%
5.
Ashford (Cat.)
355
532,701
72.82%
6.
Marcy (One.)
602
1,881,115
72.07%
7.
Massena (St. L)
1073
1,450,840
68.56%
8.
Verona (One.)
982
1,058,257
68.09%
9.
Lewiston (Nia.)
1342
3,830,759
66.40%
10.
Dover (Dut.)
506
2,029,803
65.33%
11.
Le Ray (Jef.)
808
1,135,382
63.60%
12.
Orangeville (Wyo.)
309
222,890
60.94%
13.
Greenwood (Ste.)
304
143,322
60.57%
14.
Tyre (Sen.)
317
154,132
60.52%
15.
Arkwright (Cha.)
203
158,008
59.60%
16.
Nichols (Tio.)
272
253,817
58.69%
17.
Harrisburg (Lew.)
257
77,420
57.93%
18.
Martinsburg (Lew.)
425
159,516
56.71%
19.
Cherry Creek (Cha.)
257
97,528
53.03%
20.
Delhi (Del.)
337
598,943
52.83%
21.
Eagle (Wyo.)
387
105,925
52.65%
22.
Sheldon (Wyo.)
621
232,890
52.15%
23.
Fairfield (Her.)
352
146,775
51.46%
24.
Sharon (Scho.)
357
170,813
50.79%
25.
Eaton (Mad.)
636
298,762
50.63%
Table 6. Geographic areas with highest and lowest incidence of local-option exempt value, 2023 assessment rolls
A. Ten with highest incidence
Rank
Counties
Cities
Towns
Name
Pct. local-option*
Name
Pct. local-option*
Name
Pct. local-option*
1.
Fulton
24.63%
Johnstown (Ful.)
41.45%
Ontario (Way.)
63.07%
2.
Hamilton
20.51%
Saratoga Springs (Sar.)
27.53%
Shelter Island (Suf.)
49.89%
3.
Oswego
20.00%
Auburn (Cay.)
26.30%
Lake Pleasant (Ham.)
45.78%
4.
Wayne
19.47%
Tonawanda (Eri.)
20.38%
Chautauqua (Cha.)
43.81%
5.
Putnam
16.70%
Lackawanna (Eri.)
19.52%
Jewett (Gre.)
43.12%
6.
Saratoga
16.65%
Buffalo (Eri.)
17.74%
Watson (Lew.)
40.78%
7.
Monroe
16.48%
Newburgh (Ora.)
15.72%
Volney (Osw.)
40.12%
8.
Columbia
14.95%
North Tonawanda (Nia.)
15.51%
Rhinebeck (Dut.)
39.71%
9.
Washington
14.75%
Rochester (Mon.)
14.01%
Warren (Her.)
36.95%
10.
Ulster
14.54%
Hudson (Col.)
14.01%
Oppenheim (Ful.)
34.73%
B. Ten with lowest incidence
Rank
Counties
Cities
Towns
Name
Pct. local-option*
Name
Pct. local-option*
Name
Pct. local-option*
1.
Tompkins
3.56%
Ithaca (Tom.)
2.01%
Red House (Cat.)
0.00%
2.
Wyoming
3.83%
Little Falls (Her.)
2.09%
Alfred (All.)
0.45%
3.
Seneca
3.85%
White Plains (Wes.)
2.40%
Harrisburg (Lew.)
0.53%
4.
Allegany
3.89%
Albany (Alb.)
2.44%
Blenheim (Scho.)
0.54%
5.
Yates
4.53%
Rensselaer (Ren.)
2.59%
Dover (Dut.)
0.69%
6.
Schuyler
4.76%
Binghamton (Bro.)
2.87%
Romulus (Sen.)
0.72%
7.
Delaware
4.97%
Watervliet (Alb.)
2.96%
Delhi (Del.)
0.92%
8.
Schoharie
5.16%
Peekskill (Wes.)
3.02%
Bombay (Fra.)
0.94%
9.
St Lawrence
5.47%
Geneva (Ont.)
3.79%
Marcy (One.)
0.97%
10.
Cattaraugus
5.50%
Oswego (Osw.)
3.81%
Ashford (Cat.)
0.98%
*Exempt value of local-option exemptions divided by total exempt value.
Table 7. Exempt value attributable to local option, counties ranked by percent of exempt value, 2023 assessment rolls
Table 7. Exempt value attributable to local option, counties ranked by percent of exempt value, 2023 rolls
Rank
County
Exempt value local option ($000)
Total exempt value ($000)
Pct. of value exempt
1.
Fulton
369,165
1,499,084
24.63%
2.
Hamilton
80,652
393,250
20.51%
3.
Oswego
1,193,637
5,967,465
20.00%
4.
Wayne
528,133
2,712,183
19.47%
5.
Putnam
504,876
3,024,109
16.70%
6.
Saratoga
1,195,966
7,182,782
16.65%
7.
Monroe
3,359,646
20,381,830
16.48%
8.
Columbia
409,976
2,742,610
14.95%
9.
Washington
231,323
1,568,591
14.75%
10.
Ulster
966,846
6,647,546
14.54%
11.
Rockland
1,954,250
13,860,529
14.10%
12.
Erie
4,169,023
30,148,046
13.83%
13.
Warren
312,252
2,275,403
13.72%
14.
Cayuga
349,090
2,620,665
13.32%
15.
Nassau
15,967,800
121,730,318
13.12%
16.
Onondaga
2,029,400
16,003,042
12.68%
17.
Greene
291,871
2,442,815
11.95%
18.
Orange
1,724,375
14,610,977
11.80%
19.
Dutchess
1,612,817
13,684,831
11.79%
20.
Cortland
152,054
1,349,249
11.27%
21.
Rensselaer
737,990
6,570,075
11.23%
22.
Suffolk
15,110,833
136,134,642
11.10%
23.
Chautauqua
476,158
4,520,255
10.53%
24.
Orleans
105,237
1,038,851
10.13%
25.
Clinton
241,369
2,521,470
9.57%
26.
Schenectady
452,559
4,981,710
9.08%
27.
Livingston
185,914
2,073,305
8.97%
28.
Essex
195,747
2,246,410
8.71%
29.
Broome
519,750
6,090,329
8.53%
30.
Steuben
254,646
3,148,917
8.09%
31.
Chenango
103,675
1,287,000
8.06%
32.
Chemung
167,025
2,133,594
7.83%
33.
Montgomery
126,252
1,668,518
7.57%
34.
Lewis
86,518
1,176,653
7.35%
35.
Otsego
150,056
2,087,516
7.19%
36.
Ontario
316,097
4,398,012
7.19%
37.
Herkimer
155,828
2,171,376
7.18%
38.
Genesee
125,984
1,784,676
7.06%
39.
Sullivan
320,729
4,611,106
6.96%
40.
Westchester
5,060,905
73,530,929
6.88%
41.
Oneida
729,405
10,727,852
6.80%
42.
Jefferson
311,082
4,593,954
6.77%
43.
Madison
145,558
2,196,518
6.63%
44.
Tioga
120,733
1,852,835
6.52%
45.
Niagara
608,645
10,365,251
5.87%
46.
Franklin
111,956
1,928,759
5.80%
47.
Albany
1,104,813
19,563,812
5.65%
48.
Cattaraugus
164,133
2,983,794
5.50%
49.
St Lawrence
279,856
5,111,542
5.47%
50.
Schoharie
93,579
1,813,154
5.16%
51.
Delaware
109,943
2,210,404
4.97%
52.
Schuyler
33,695
707,865
4.76%
53.
Yates
69,059
1,525,567
4.53%
54.
Allegany
66,322
1,702,958
3.89%
55.
Seneca
86,377
2,241,237
3.85%
56.
Wyoming
69,665
1,817,780
3.83%
57.
Tompkins
234,689
6,596,365
3.56%
Table 8. City/Town distribution of exempt value attributable to local option exemptions: 2023 assessment rolls
Table 8. City/Town distribution of exempt value attributable to local option exemptions: 2023 rolls
Percent of value in local option exemptions
Number of cities/towns
Percent of cities/towns
0 - 9.99
557
55.980%
10 - 19.99
346
34.774%
20 - 20.99
77
7.739%
30 - 30.99
8
0.804%
40 or more
7
0.704%
1 Most exemptions are granted under Article 4 of the Real Property Tax Law, but others are authorized by a wide variety of statutes ranging from the Agriculture and Markets Law to the Transportation Law.
2The material in the report relates to exemptions only. Not covered are the restricted assessments which apply to certain types of property (e.g., condominiums), tax abatement programs, and formerly real property which has been statutorily redefined as personal (non-taxable) property (e.g., certain switching equipment owned by telephone companies). Restricted assessments, tax abatements, and statutory redefinitions, like exemptions, are tax expenditures in that they reduce or shift tax liability.